- THE CITY OF GOD - THE OMNIPOTENCE OF THE CREATOR - BY SAINT AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO -
- That Rome made its founder Romulus a god because it loved him; but the Church loved Christ because it believed Him to be God -
Let us here recite the passage in which Tully expresses his astonishment that the apotheosis of Romulus should have been credited. I shall insert his words as they stand: "it is most worthy of remark in Romulus that other men who are said to have become gods lived in educated ages, when there was a greater propensity to the fabulous and when the uninstructed were easily persuaded to believe anything. But the age of Romulus was barely six hundred years old and already literature and science had dispelled the errors that attach to an uncultured age." And a little after he says of the same Romulus words to this effect: "From this we may perceive that Homer had flourished long before Romulus and that there was now so much learning in individuals and so generally diffused an enlightenment, that scarcely any room was left for fable. For antiquity admitted fables and sometimes even very clumsy ones; but this age [of Romulus] was sufficiently enlightened to reject whatever had not the air of truth." Thus one of the most learned men and certainly the most eloquent, M. Tullius Cicero, says that it is surprising that the divinity of Romulus was believed in because the times were already so enlightened that they would not accept a fabulous fiction. But who believed that Romulus was a god except Rome which was itself small and in its infancy?
Then afterwards it was necessary that succeeding generations should preserve the tradition of their ancestors; that drinking in this superstition with their mother's milk, the state might grow and come to such power that it might dictate this belief, as from a point of vantage to all the nations over whom its sway extended. These nations, though they might not believe that Romulus was a god, at least said so that they might not give offence to their sovereign state by refusing to give its founder that title which was given him by Rome which had adopted this belief not by a love of error, but an error of love. Though Christ Jesus is the founder of the heavenly and eternal city, yet it did not believe Him to be God because it was founded by Him but rather it is founded by Him in virtue of its belief. Rome, after it had been built and dedicated, worshipped its founder in a temple as a god; but this Jerusalem laid Christ Jesus, its God, as its foundation, that the building and dedication might proceed. The former city loved its founder and therefore believed him to be a god; the latter believed Christ to be God and therefore loved Him. There was an antecedent cause for the love of the former city and for its believing that even a false dignity attached to the object of its love; so there was an antecedent cause for the belief of the latter and for its loving the true dignity which a proper faith, not a rash surmise, ascribed to its object. For not to mention the multitude of very striking miracles which proved that Christ Jesus is God, there were also divine prophecies heralding Him, prophecies most worthy of belief which being already accomplished, we have not, like the fathers, to wait for their verification. As for or as of Romulus, on the other hand and of his building Rome and reigning in it, we read or hear the narrative of what did take place, not prediction which beforehand said that such things should be and so far as his reception among the gods is concerned. History only records that this was believed and does not state it as fact; for no miraculous signs testified to the truth of this. For as to that wolf which is said to have nursed the twin brothers and which is considered a great marvel, how does this prove him to have been divine?
For even supposing that this nurse was a real wolf and not a mere courtezan, yet she nursed both brothers and Remus is not reckoned a god. Besides, what was there to hinder anyone from asserting that Romulus or Hercules or any such man, was a god? Or who would rather choose to die than profess belief in his divinity? Did a single nation worship Romulus among its gods, unless it were forced through fear of the Roman name? Who can number the multitudes who have chosen death in the most cruel shapes rather than deny the divinity of Christ? Thus, the dread of some slight indignation which it was supposed, perhaps, groundlessly, might exists in the mind of the Romans, constrained some states who were subject to Rome to worship Romulus as a god; whereas the dread, not of a slight mental shock, but of severe and various punishments and of death itself, the most formidable of all, could not prevent an immense multitude of martyrs throughout the world from not merely worshipping but also confessing Jesus Christ as Son of the living God. City of Christ which although as yet a stranger upon earth had countless hosts of citizens, did not make war upon its godless persecutors for the sake of temporal security but preferred to win eternal salvation by abstaining from war. They were bound, imprisoned, beaten, tortured, burned, torn in pieces, massacred, and yet they multiplied. It was not given to them to fight for their eternal salvation except by despising their temporal salvation for their Savior's sake.
I am aware that Cicero, in the third book of his De Republica, if I mistake not, argues that a first-rate power will not engage in war except either for honour or for safety. What he has to say about the question of safety and what he means by safety, he explains in another place, saying: "Private persons frequently evade, by a speedy death, destitution, exile, bonds, the scourge and the other pains which even the most insensible feel. But to states, death which seems to emancipate individuals from all punishments is itself a punishment; for a state should be so constituted as to be eternal. Thus, death is not natural to a republic as to man, to whom death is not necessary but often even desirable. When a state is destroyed, obliterated, annihilated, it is as if (to compare great things with small) this whole world perished and collapsed." Cicero said this because he, with the Platonists, believed that the world would not perish. It is therefore agreed that, according to Cicero, a state should engage in war for the safety which preserves the state permanently in existence, though its citizens change; as the foliage of an olive or laurel or any tree of this kind, is perennial, the old leaves being replaced by fresh ones.
For death, as he says, is no punishment to individuals but rather delivers them from all other punishments but it is a punishment to the state. Therefore, it is reasonably asked whether the Saguntines did right when they chose that their whole state should perish rather that they should break faith with the Roman republic; for this deed of theirs is applauded by the citizens of the earthly republic. I do not see how they could follow the advise of Cicero who tells us that no war is to be undertaken save for safety or for honour; neither does he say which of these two is to be preferred, if a case should occur in which the one could not be preserved without the loss of the other. For manifestly, if the Saguntines chose safety, they must break faith; if they kept faith, they must reject safety; as also it fell out. But the safety of the city of God is such that it can be retained or rather acquired by and with faith and love; but if faith and love be abandoned, no one can attain it. It is this thought of a most steadfast and patient spirit that has made so many noble martyrs while Romulus has not had, and could not have, so much as one to die for his divinity.
- That the world's belief in Christ Jesus is the result of divine power, not of human persuasion -
It is thoroughly ridiculous to make mention of the false divinity of Romulus as any way comparable to that of Christ Jesus. Nevertheless, if Romulus lived about six hundred years before Cicero, in an age which already was so enlightened that it rejected all impossibilities, how much more, in an age which certainly was more enlightened, being six hundred years later, the age of Cicero himself and of the emperors Augustus and years later, the age of Cicero himself, and of the emperors Augustus and Tiberius would the human mind have refused to listen to or believe in the resurrection of Christ's body and its ascension into heaven and have scouted it as an impossibility, had not the divinity of truth itself or the truth of the divinity and corroborating miraculous signs, proved that it could had happened? Through of these testimonies and notwithstanding the opposition and terror of so many cruel persecutions, the resurrection and immortality of the flesh, first in Christ Jesus and subsequently in all the new world, was believed and was intrepidly proclaimed and was sown over the whole world, to be fertilized richly with the blood of the martyrs. For the predictions of the prophets that had preceded the events were read, they were corroborated by powerful signs and the truths was seen to be not contradictory to reason, but only different from customary ideas, so that at length the world embraced the faith it had furiously persecuted.
- Of the miracles which were wrought that the world might believe in Christ Jesus and which have not ceased since the world believed -
Why, they say, are those miracles which you affirm were wrought formerly, wrought no longer? I might, indeed, reply that miracles were necessary before the world believed, in order that it might believe. And whoever now-a-days demands to see prodigies that he/she may believe, is himself/herself a great prodigy because he/she does not believe, though the whole world does. But they make these objections for the sole purpose of insinuating that even those former miracles were never wrought. How, then, is it that everywhere Christ Jesus is celebrated with such firm belief in His resurrection and ascension? How is it that in enlightened times, in His resurrection and ascension? How is it that in enlightened times, in which every impossibility is rejected, the world has, without any miracles, believed things marvellously incredible? Or will they say that these things were credible and therefore were credited? Why then do they themselves not believe? Our argument, therefore, is a summary one - either incredible things which were not witnessed have caused the world to believe other incredible things which both occurred and were witnessed or this matter was so credible that it needed no miracles in proof of it and therefore convicts these unbelievers of unpardonable scepticism. This I might say for the sake of refuting these most frivolous objections. But we cannot deny that many miracles were wrought to confirm that one grand and health giving miracle of Christ's ascension to heaven with the flesh in which He rose. For these most trustworthy books of ours contain in one narrative both the miracles that were wrought and the creed which they were wrought to confirm. The miracles were published that they might produce faith and the faith which they produced brought them into greater prominence.
For they are read in congregations that they may be believed and yet they would not be so read unless they were believed. For even now miracles are wrought in the name of Christ Jesus, whether by His sacraments or by the prayers or relics of His saints; but they are not so brilliant and conspicuous as to cause them to be published with such glory as accompanied the former miracles. For the canon of the sacred writings which behoved to be closed - Another reading has diflamatum, "published." - causes those to be everywhere recited and to sink into the memory of all the congregations; but these modern miracles are scarcely known even to the whole population in the midst of which they are wrought and at the best are confined to one spot. For frequently they are known only to a very few persons, while all the rest are ignorant of them, especially if the state is a large one; and when they are reported to other persons in other localities, there is no sufficient authority to give them prompt and unwavering credence, although they are reported to the faithful by the faithful.
The miracle which was wrought at Milan when I was there and by which a blind man was restored to sight, could come to the knowledge of many; for not only is the city a large one, but also the emperor was there at the time and the occurrence was witnessed by an immense concourse of people that had gathered to the bodies of the martyrs Protasius and Gervasius which had long lain concealed and unknown but were now made known to the bishop Ambrose in a dream and discovered by him. By virtue of these remains the darkness of that blind man was scattered and he saw the light of day. - A somewhat fuller account of this miracle is given by Saint Augustine in the Confessions, ix. 16. See also Serm. 286 and Saint Ambrose , Ep. 22. A translation of this epistle in full is given in Isaac Taylor's Ancient Christianity, ii 242, where this miracle is taken as a specimen of the so-called miracles of that age and submitted to a detailed examination. The result arrived at will be gathered from the following sentence: "In the Nicene Church, so lax were the notions of common morality and in so feeble a manner did the fear of God influence the conduct of leading men, that, on occasions when the Church was to be served and her assailants to be confounded, they did not scruple to take upon themselves the contrivance and execution of the most degrading impostures." - Psalms 270 - It is to be observed, however, that Saint Augustine was, at least in this instance, one of the deceived. -
But who but a very small number are aware of the cure which was wrought upon Innocentius, ex-advocate of the deputy prefecture, a cure wrought at Carthage, in my presence and under my own eyes? For when I and my brother Alypius....... - Page One -
- WELCOME TO SACRED SCRIPTURE / WORD OF GOD / HOLY BIBLE READER'S COMMUNITY -
Wishing you, 'Happy Reading', and may God, the Father, the Son of the living God, Jesus Christ, fills your heart, mind, thoughts, and grants you: The Holy Spirit, that is, Wisdom, Knowledge, Understanding, Counsel, Piety, Fortitude, Fear of the Lord, and also His fruits of the Holy Spirit, that is, Love, Joy, Peace, Patience, Kindness, Goodness, Trustfulness, Gentleness and Self-Control. Amen! God blessing be upon you!
If we live by the truth and in love, we shall grow in all ways into Christ Jesus, who is the head by whom the whole body is fitted and joined together, every joint adding its own strength, for each separate part to work according to it function, so the body grows until it has built itself up, in love. - Ephesians 4:15-16 -